Dr. Stephan STOIBER (graduate engineer and DDS)

Biophysical Natural Therapies

 

The application of Dr. Karl Erdt’s biophysical diagnostics and therapy in my practice                     

Last Update February 2010

 

The biofield test was developed about 30 years ago by the physicist Dr. Paul Schweitzer, who had previously worked for IBM in the information technology department for many years. He was interested in biophysics and, after successfully completing his degree as an alternative healing practitioner, began to devote more and more time to the study of biophysical fields and their influence on human health.

 

In the mid twentieth century, Harold S. Burr, professor for anatomy and neuroanatomy at Yale University, managed to prove that all life forms are surrounded by an energy field that can be measured using a special voltmeter. He referred to this as “life-field” or “l-field”. Burr showed that this field was measurable not only in human beings, animals, and plants, but also in seeds, eggs, and single-celled microbes.

 

Burr began to believe that this “life-field” was responsible for maintaining a living organism’s specific form even though its billions of molecules were constantly being replaced and renewed. According to him, this field has a holographic structure. This implies that the information of the entire field exists in its entirety even in the tiniest particle of the field. Therefore, each single biological cell and each drop of blood equally contains the blueprint of the entire organism.

 

During the 1980s, the British biologist Dr. Rupert Sheldrake picked up on the idea of this type of field and during the course of his research came to refer to it as a “morphogenetic field”. To this day, classical molecular biology has not been able to give a satisfactory answer to the question of how a body establishes and maintains its form: Who or what prompts the same type of cells with the same type of proteins to form an upper arm at one time, and a lower arm at another?

 

During the course of the centuries, renowned scholars of various disciplines have carried out well thought-out experiments that provided us with an extensive amount of information on the central organizing energy that governs our bodies and the rest of the universe. We humans and other creatures are energetic units in a field of energy, connected with everyone and to everything in this world. This field is responsible for our most elaborate mental capacities and at the same time the source of information that controls the growth and development of our bodies.

It is this field rather than germs or microbes that ultimately decide whether we are healthy or sick. (See the highly recommendable book The Field by Lynne McTaggart)

 

The biofield test and the resulting biofield therapy pertain to and function on precisely this etheric level.

Observing strict mathematical and physical guidelines, Dr. Schweitzer developed the so-called h-dipole (a sort of single-handed rod) with which a patient’s blood sample could be tested for all kinds of afflictions.

 

The new comprehensive medical test concept developed by Dr. Karl Erdt and the resulting new therapies

 

Beginning in 1990 and parallel to my work as a dentist, I have continuously studied various nature therapies and alternative medicine approaches. I have also gained extensive experience in applying these therapies in practice.

 

At the beginning of this personal development, I studied the basics of oral acupuncture and later became licensed for certified electro-acupuncture based on the method of Dr. Voll. To this day, I am a member of the International Medical Society for Electro-Acupuncture and a member of the German ZÄN (Central Association of Doctors for Nature Therapies).

 

During an annual meeting of the Biofield Society in 1998, I met Dr. Karl Erdt, who told me about his extremely interesting approaches and ideas concerning new developments in diagnostics and therapies using the biofield test.

I was fascinated by his ideas and the more I began to familiarize myself with them, the more it became clear to me how revolutionary and trend-setting this concept is. It entailed an entirely new test method and therapy, named after Dr. Karl Erdt, which over the course of the past five to six years has led to ground-breaking findings for diagnostics and therapies especially with respect to chronic, autoimmune, and cancerous illnesses. Today we employ Dr. Schweitzer’s measurement technique in this context.

 

A considerable proportion of the causes for illnesses can be found by searching for an altered control mechanism at the level of higher consciousness. These are memory patterns that are saved in the form of a geometric code or as high-frequency vibrations in the neural network. If it were possible to gain access to these frequency patterns, one could potentially restore the state of equilibrium initially intended by “mother nature” and thus understand the causes of many illnesses that are still considered to be inexplicable.

Research would need to be conducted on how to develop more effective therapies aimed at balancing and correcting both material (i.e. physical) afflictions as well as strains on the level of higher consciousness.

 

In order to achieve this goal, the bioenergy modulator developed by Dieter Schneider has proven to be particularly effective. The device uses the empirically proven healing effects of the Platonic year’s rhythmic vibrations as well as the 12 planetary wavelengths of our solar system: Earth, Sun, Saturn, Uranus, Venus, etc. possess a high energetic charge and therefore an inductive power that greatly enhances the desired healing effects. For example, using photovoltaics, the sun’s radiation (i.e. its wavelength or vibrations) can be converted into electric power.

(For those interested: The common attributes generally shared by planets, sounds, and colors and how specific vibrations affect the human spirit and body are vividly described in Hans Cousto’s book Cosmic Octave: Origin of Harmony, Planets, Tones, Colors, the Power of Inherent Vibrations.)

 

The research of the neurobiologist Professor Joachim Bauer from the University of Freiburg, Germany, fully confirms the considerations outlined above (see his book Das Gedächtnis des Körpers [The Body’s Memory]. Professor Bauer even maintains that he has provided scientific evidence showing that 99 percent of all illnesses originate from and are sustained by dysfunctions in humans’ so-called “higher consciousness”. These dysfunctions can have an extremely negative effect on genetic activity, for example through repression, activation, complete blockade, disruption of the synchronization of individual genes amongst one another, etc. Emotions influence the so-called transposase. On the DNA-strand, these specific protein sequences are always located right before a gene sequence, which is controlled by the specific activity of the transposase (see the 2006 Nobel Prize in Chemistry awarded to Roger Kronteig).

Professor Bauer emphasizes that conventional medicine is so far unable to grasp this control mechanism of higher consciousness, let alone to develop a comprehensive energetic concept for the diagnosis and treatment of illnesses. However, today we have precisely this kind of concept, which has continuously been improved and is being successfully applied in practice for some years now—thanks to Dr. Erdt’s outstanding ideas.

 

Energetic studies of precious stones reveal a very precisely defined, specific high-frequency pattern, which results from their stable geometric structures. With these, many pertinent disturbance mechanisms, discrepancies, blockades, altered gene activities, conflicts, etc. in the higher consciousness of the patient can be discovered, diagnosed, and subsequently eliminated or at least neutralized with the help of the bioenergy modulator.

 

Usually this requires several sessions. During these, the patient holds two electrodes in his or her hands that are connected to the bioenergy modulator. Based on an elaborately tested treatment plan, the device is equipped with healing substances that are thus integrated into the contact cycle. These can include, for example, tissue salts, Bach flowers, enzyme products made by the company Horvi, aura soma products, precious stones, aromas, colors, spagyric essences, Solunates, geometric bodies, or substances representative for the wavelengths of various planets. In order to maximize the resonance response, additional substances with varying potencies can also be added.

 

Application

 

The decisive criterion for this new test method developed by Dr. Karl Erdt is the individual, hierarchical priority of the afflictions from a therapeutic standpoint. What sort of access is there for what kind of therapy? What kind of therapy is currently favored by the organism? (For example: treatment with the device or taking medication? With regard to the latter: which manufacturer and how high should the dosage be, etc.?) The time intervals that must be observed between each stage of the therapy are also important. Moreover, sometimes the question arises whether or not an accompanying therapy with conventional measures is desirable or appropriate—for example osteopathy or vitamin-, mineral-, and hormone-supplements, etc.

 

This test method already simulates the healing progress during the test itself. The practitioner thus attains additional reassurance regarding the therapy. There is certainly no contradiction between this test method and the conventional academic understanding of illness and diagnostics. Rather, it employs new approaches in order to get to the core or cause of illnesses that have so far been considered untreatable. We rely on the latest findings from the field of modern physics to make diagnostic assertions about purely physical phenomena (electromagnetic fields and high-frequency patterns are altered in states of illness). Reestablishing the initial control mechanisms on a higher level as intended by “mother nature” is fairly time consuming, as the physical symptoms only disappear once the disturbing vibrations in the etheric-energetic field subside or become harmonized again and the healthy state remains stable in the long term. This period of transformation can take weeks or even months and requires patience.

 

With the new biofield test, a highly individualized treatment plan can be developed for each particular patient. The diagnostic scope also incorporates the mutual relationships between specific afflictions and their effects, thus allowing for a better overview of the holistic-medical effects, the therapy they imply, as well as their hierarchical order.

 

What is decisive here is not the quality or type of affliction as such (for example afflictions resulting from poisons, infections, yeasts, parasites, etc.), but rather how and where their effects take hold. Mercury exposure can lead to migraines in one patient, to dizziness in another, and to a rheumatic affliction in a third. The diversity of symptoms can even encompass severe depression.

 

Precisely this differentiation of the individual afflictions’ various effects becomes visible with the new test method by Dr. Karl Erdt. This can then be taken into account during the therapy and, individually tested, largely corresponds to the findings of conventional medicine. Diagnostically and therapeutically, this is a fundamental difference to the older, standard biofield test methods using mixtures of mineral salts as they are still taught by Dr. Schweitzer to this day.

 

Range of possible treatments and the course and success of the therapy

 

The range of treatment possibilities made possible by this new test method is strikingly broad: It encompasses nearly all illnesses. Only when a prolonged illness has brought about major, irreversible organ damage can this therapy no longer promise a complete success.

 

Given that numerous illnesses have been classified as untreatable or incurable by conventional medicine, it is not without pride that we note a success rate of 80, up to well over 90 percent, depending on the severity of the illness, for our therapy.

 

Conventional Western medicine, but also many other nature therapies, are powerless when it comes to healing the following illnesses:

 

allergies to pollen, weeds, grasses and flowers

asthma allergies

food intolerance or food allergies

allergies to dust mites and pet hair

eczema, skin rashes, urticaria (hives)

arthritis and rheumatic illnesses

migraines and persistent headaches

long-term infections and inflammations

herpes and herpes zoster (shingles)

cardiovascular problems with inexplicable, sporadic high blood

pressure

Lyme disease, the “kissing disease” (infectious mononucleosis), etc.

illnesses with an autoimmune mechanism such as MS, Parkinson’s

disease, fibromyalgia, lateral sclerosis, urticaria, psoriasis, cancer, and other “incurable” diseases

 

Autoimmune illnesses

 

Dr. Erdt succeeded in pinpointing some important parameters that accompany and possibly even cause these diseases. New technical instruments had to be developed for the respective therapies. We are already beyond the prototype stage in their development. The new generation of instruments opens up new possibilities particularly in the area of sound therapy for healing autoimmune illnesses. We have already obtained very promising first results. We can already say with some certainty that there exist irregularities (or deformations) in the DNA, especially in individual chromosomes, that we can treat therapeutically. The behavior of the autoimmune system affects organs, cells, and receptors. We are increasingly able to repair or to disable these defects or deformations in the DNA.

 

Cancer

 

During the last twenty to twenty-five years, a tremendous amount of money has been spent on cancer research. Nevertheless, neither in terms of its causes nor in terms of therapies have we witnessed path-breaking successes or even significant progress.

 

The conclusion that the path so far taken by conventional medicine is leading nowhere seems self-evident. Clinical methods and approaches for studying the origins of cancer are obviously not just inadequate, but also faulty in terms of their starting point. Thus, other parameters for cancer diagnostics need to be used as a basis for comparison. In this respect, particular attention should be paid to information- and control-mechanisms inside and outside of human cells. We discovered that potential cancer patients exhibit a change in the polarization of the life-field of the cell membrane, the mesenchyme, the undeveloped stem cell, the cell genome, etc. This could usually be determined long before the development of a tumor would be detected with established clinical or image-generating methods.

 

My personal measurement results have so far always been congruent with those of Dr. Erdt.

The depth of the biofield diagnostics goes far beyond the possibilities of classical preventative medicine because the parameters that we can measure allow for a prognosis long before the development of a tumor becomes visible under a histologist’s microscope.

 

These observations lead to the assertion that long-term exposure to the wrong information from the energetic fields or the DNA greatly contributes to the development of tumors in certain organs due to faulty encoding.

Current research in biochemistry has found that the glucose metabolism plays an important role in cancer illnesses. Especially in the case of primary tumors, the transketolase enzyme TKTL1 is detectable in the cancer cells’ mitochondria, which is of great importance for their spreading and helpful when deciding whether, for example, the removal of a tumor without lymph node metastases (in a healthy patient) needs to be accompanied by chemo- or radiation therapy.

We are already able to neutralize the effects of this TKTL1 enzyme through our therapy.

 

Even when there is no tangible diagnostic finding from the perspective of conventional medicine, when in doubt it makes sense to test and, if need be, to treat the biophysical field in order to prevent tumor development at the earliest possible stage. In my view, this is the best an alternative practitioner or a doctor can nowadays do in terms of preventative medical care.

 

Two examples from my practice:

 

Case 1:

A 49-year-old female patient came to me in the fall of 2005 claiming that she felt that there was something wrong with her lower abdomen. A previous gynecological examination, however, had not yielded any significant results.

My tests, on the other hand, indicated a definite change in the parameters known to be associated with cancer. During a subsequent in-depth examination at a gynecological clinic, three ovarian cysts were discovered, whose existence reinforced the suspicion of malignant cell-development. Of course, the clinic’s staff strongly recommended an operation.

The patient, however, was determined to first undergo a three- to four-month cancer therapy based on the newly developed therapeutic approach by Dr. Erdt. In May 2006 she returned for an exam at the gynecological clinic. Despite a rigorous examination, my colleagues there were no longer able to detect any cysts. The operation had thus become superfluous.

 

Case 2:

In August 2007, an inoperable, small-celled lung cancer was discovered in a young woman (38 years old). In the Clinic for Lung Diseases in Gautingen, Germany, a chemotherapy was initiated in September 2007. Parallel, she was treated with our therapy. For us, this also meant an obligatory accompanying treatment of the chemotherapy in order to neutralize its negative side effects as much as possible. In between the chemotherapy sessions, we were able to apply our therapy.

The patient underwent another thorough examination in Gautingen in March 2008. According to the doctors, no tumor cells could be found despite exhaustive tests (i.e. CT).

This corresponded exactly with my evaluation.

 

In these cases, I was obviously able to eliminate the faulty information in the cells’ “software” and thus to neutralize the cause for the formation and spread of the cancerous cells.

 

The tumor therapy using the new instrument prototypes is usually administered in several stages and generally requires a break of several days in between each session.

 

These instruments work by disabling the faulty information in the DNA in general. More specifically, one differentiates between irregularities in the structure and in the geometry of the gene, particularly whether the nucleotide structure, the nucleotide sequence, the nucleotide bridge, or the geometry itself is affected (see the Nobel Prize for Medicine awarded to the US scientists Andrew Z. Fire and Craig C. Mello).

The results Dr. Erdt and I were able obtain so far are very encouraging. We hope that a breakthrough in cancer therapy is imminent.

Our experiences indisputably show: If we were able to detect the cancer parameters at an early stage and subsequently applied our therapy, a complete recovery was possible. The danger of relapse or metastases was greatly reduced.

 

Even if our test and therapy methods cannot be successful in each individual case, they certainly do not entail any negative side effects or additional problems for the patients either.

 

Dr. Erdt and the philosophy of the biophysical paradigm:

 

“Those who want to get ahead first need to discard old dogmas and untested doctrines, as well as apodigmas that have quietly and without question ‘crept in’. Dogmas, doctrines, and apodigmas clip the wings of the imagination, they do not allow creativity to unfold and they destroy the stuff of which dreams are made.

It is necessary to establish a guideline, a paradigm for oneself that does justice to the complexity of biological systems. And since l-fields are complex biological systems, there can no longer be linear causality, no inflexible dogmas and doctrines, no perfect instructions for how to proceed. Complex biological systems are chaotic; they are predictable for a few seconds and shortly afterwards open to countless possible reactions. That which seems perfect and definite today, worthy of being proclaimed as a dogma or a doctrine, eludes linear laws tomorrow.”